Once Im Classified as Disabled Can I Work Again

The nifty extension of our feel in recent years has brought light to the insufficiency of our simple mechanical conceptions and, as a result, has shaken the foundation on which the customary estimation of ascertainment was based.

Niels Henrik David Bohr (vii October 1885 – 18 November 1962) was a Danish physicist. He received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1922 for his contributions which were essential to modern understandings of atomic construction and quantum mechanics.

Quotes [edit]

The word "reality" is likewise a word, a word which we must learn to use correctly.

Nosotros are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides u.s. is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of existence right.

Physics is to be regarded not so much as the study of something a priori given, merely rather every bit the evolution of methods of ordering and surveying human being feel.

It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about nature...

Information technology is a great pity that human beings cannot find all of their satisfaction in scientific contemplativeness.

Some subjects are and so serious that ane tin can only joke most them.

• Those who are not shocked when they first come up across quantum theory cannot possibly accept understood it.
  • In a 1952 chat with Heisenberg and Pauli in Copenhagen; quoted in Heisenberg, Werner, Physics and Across. (New York: Harper & Row, 1971) p. 206.

• Nosotros must be clear that when it comes to atoms, language can exist used but as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly then concerned with describing facts every bit with creating images and establishing mental connections.
  • In his offset meeting with Werner Heisenberg in early summer 1920, in response to questions on the nature of linguistic communication, every bit reported in Discussions most Language (1933); quoted in Defense Implications of International Indeterminacy (1972) by Robert J. Pranger, p. 11, and Theorizing Modernism : Essays in Disquisitional Theory (1993) by Steve Giles, p. 28

• The chiliad discoveries which scientific experiment yielded at and about the turn of the century, in which investigators in many countries took an eminent part and which were destined all unexpectedly to give us a fresh insight into the structure of atoms, were due in the first example, equally all are aware, to the work of the dandy investigators of the English school, Sir Joseph Thomson and Sir Ernest Rutherford, who have inscribed their names on the tablets of the history of scientific research as distinguished witnesses to the truth that imagination and acumen are capable of penetrating the crowded mass of registered experience and of revealing Nature'southward simplicity to our gaze.
  • Niels Bohr'south speech at the Nobel Banquet in Stockholm (December x, 1922)

• The dandy extension of our experience in recent years has brought light to the insufficiency of our elementary mechanical conceptions and, every bit a consequence, has shaken the foundation on which the customary estimation of observation was based.
  • Niels Bohr, "Diminutive Physics and the Description of Nature" (1934)

• Isolated material particles are abstractions, their properties existence definable and appreciable only through their interaction with other systems.
  • "Diminutive Physics and the Description of Nature" (1934)

• What is it that nosotros humans depend on? Nosotros depend on our words... Our task is to communicate feel and ideas to others. We must strive continually to extend the scope of our description, but in such a fashion that our messages practice not thereby lose their objective or unambiguous character ... We are suspended in language in such a way that we cannot say what is up and what is downwardly. The word "reality" is also a word, a discussion which we must learn to use correctly.
  • Quoted in Philosophy of Science Vol. 37 (1934), p. 157, and in The Truth of Scientific discipline : Concrete Theories and Reality (1997) by Roger Gerhard Newton, p. 176

• For a parallel to the lesson of atomic theory regarding the express applicability of such customary idealizations, we must in fact turn to quite other branches of science, such equally psychology, or even to that kind of epistemological problems with which already thinkers like Buddha and Lao Tzu take been confronted, when trying to harmonize our position as spectators and actors in the dandy drama of beingness.
  • Voice communication on quantum theory at Celebrazione del Secondo Centenario della Nascita di Luigi Galvani, Bologna, Italian republic (October 1937)

• Contraria Sunt Complementa
  • Opposites are complementary.
    • Motto he chose for his glaze of arms, when granted the Danish Order of the Elephant in 1947.

• Notwithstanding far the phenomena transcend the scope of classical physical explanation, the business relationship of all evidence must be expressed in classical terms. The argument is that merely past the discussion "experiment" nosotros refer to a situation where we can tell others what we have done and what we have learned and that, therefore, the business relationship of the experimental organization and of the results of the observations must exist expressed in unambiguous language with suitable awarding of the terminology of classical physics.
  • Niels Bohr, "Discussions with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics," in Paul Arthur Schilpp, Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist (1949) pp. 199-241.

• An adept is a person who has found out by his own painful experience all the mistakes that i can make in a very narrow field.
  • As quoted by Edward Teller, in Dr. Edward Teller's Magnificent Obsession by Robert Coughlan, in LIFE mag (half dozen September 1954), p. 62
  • Variant: An practiced is a man who has fabricated all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field.
    • As quoted by Edward Teller (10 October 1972), and A Dictionary of Scientific Quotations (1991) by Alan L. Mackay, p. 35

• We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides usa is whether information technology is crazy enough to have a run a risk of being right.
  • Said to Wolfgang Pauli after his presentation of Heisenberg's and Pauli's nonlinear field theory of elementary particles, at Columbia University (1958), as reported by F. J. Dyson in his paper "Innovation in Physics" (Scientific American, 199, No. 3, September 1958, pp. 74-82; reprinted in "JingShin Theoretical Physics Symposium in Honor of Professor Ta-You lot Wu," edited by Jong-Ping Hsu & Leonardo Hsu, Singapore; River Edge, NJ: Earth Scientific, 1998, pp. 73-ninety, here: p. 84).
  • Your theory is crazy, but information technology'south non crazy enough to be true.
    • As quoted in First Philosophy: The Theory of Everything (2007) by Spencer Scoular, p. 89
  • There are many slight variants on this remark:
    • We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy plenty.
    • Nosotros are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question is whether information technology is crazy enough to be have a take chances of being right.
    • Nosotros in the back are convinced your theory is crazy. Only what divides the states is whether it is crazy enough.
    • Your theory is crazy, the question is whether it'southward crazy enough to be true.
    • Aye, I remember that your theory is crazy. Sadly, it'due south not crazy plenty to exist believed.

• Physics is to be regarded not so much as the study of something a priori given, but rather as the evolution of methods of ordering and surveying human experience. In this respect our job must exist to account for such experience in a way independent of individual subjective judgement and therefore objective in the sense that it tin be unambiguously communicated in ordinary human linguistic communication.
  • "The Unity of Human Noesis" (October 1960)

• Every valuable human being must be a radical and a rebel, for what he must aim at is to brand things better than they are.
  • As quoted in The Globe of the Atom (1966) by Henry Abraham Boorse and Lloyd Motz, p. 741

• How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we take some hope of making progress.
  • As quoted in Niels Bohr : The Man, His Science, & the World They Changed (1966) by Ruth Moore, p. 196

• Two sorts of truth: profound truths recognized by the fact that the reverse is also a profound truth, in contrast to trivialities where opposites are obviously absurd.
  • Equally quoted past his son Hans Bohr in "My Father", published in Niels Bohr: His Life and Work (1967), p. 328
  • Unsourced variant: The opposite of a correct statement is a imitation argument. Only the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.
  • Equally quoted in Max Delbrück, Mind from Affair: An Essay on Evolutionary Epistemology, (1986) p. 167. It is the hallmark of whatever deep truth that its negation is also a deep truth

• Every sentence I utter must be understood non as an affidavit, but as a question.
  • As quoted in A Dictionary of Scientific Quotations (1991) by Alan Fifty. Mackay, p. 35

• It is a nifty pity that human beings cannot find all of their satisfaction in scientific contemplativeness.
  • Every bit quoted in Chandra: A Biography of Southward. Chandrasekhar‎ (1991) by Kameshwar C. Wali, p. 147

• Anyone who is not shocked past breakthrough theory has not understood information technology.
  • As quoted in Coming together the Universe Halfway (2007) by Karen Michelle Barad, p. 254, with a footnote citing The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr (1998).
  • Variants: Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum mechanics cannot possibly take understood it.
    Those who are not shocked when they first come beyond quantum theory cannot mayhap take understood it.
    Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood a single discussion.
    If y'all think you tin can talk almost quantum theory without feeling dizzy, you haven't understood the first thing near it.

• Some subjects are and then serious that one can only joke about them.
  • Every bit quoted in The Genius of Science: A Portrait Gallery (2000) past Abraham Pais, p. 24
  • Some things are so serious that one can merely joke well-nigh them.
    • Variant without any citation as to writer in Deprival is not a river in Arab republic of egypt (1998) by Sandi Bachom, p. 85.

• Truth and clarity are complementary.
  • As quoted in Quantum Theory and the Flight from Realism : Philosophical Responses to Quantum Mechanics (2000) by Christopher Norris, p. 234

• It is not plenty to be wrong, one must as well exist polite.
  • Every bit quoted in The Genius of Science: A Portrait Gallery (2000) by Abraham Pais, p. 24

• Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.
  • As quoted in Values of the Wise : Humanity's Highest Aspirations (2004) by Jason Merchey, p. 63

• Oh, what idiots we all accept been. This is just as it must be.
  • In response to Frisch & Meitner's explanation of nuclear fission, equally quoted in The Physicists - A generation that inverse the world (1981) by C.P.Snow, p. 96

• I get into the Upanishads to enquire questions.
  • As quoted in God Is Not 1 : The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World and Why Their Differences Affair (2010), by Stephen Prothero, Ch, 4 : Hinduism : The Way of Devotion, p. 144

• No, no, you are not thinking, y'all are just existence logical.
  • In response to those who made purely formal or mathematical arguments, as quoted in What Little I Remember (1979) past Otto Robert Frisch, p. 95

• I am absolutely prepared to talk about the spiritual life of an electronic computer: to state that it is reflecting or is in a bad mood... The question whether the motorcar really feels or ponders, or whether information technology merely looks as though it did, is of form admittedly meaningingless.
  • As quoted in a alphabetic character written from J. Kalckar to John A. Wheeler dated June 10, 1977, which appears in Wheeler's "Law Without Police force," pg 207.

[edit]

The fact that religions through the ages have spoken in images, parables, and paradoxes means simply that in that location are no other ways of grasping the reality to which they refer. Just that does non hateful that it is not a 18-carat reality.

Nowadays, the individual seems to be able to choose the spiritual framework of his thoughts and actions quite freely, and this freedom reflects the fact that the boundaries between the diverse cultures and societies are start to become more fluid. But even when an individual tries to achieve the greatest possible degree of independence, he will still be swayed by the existing spiritual structures — consciously or unconsciously.

Statements of Bohr after the Solvay Briefing of 1927, as quoted in Physics and Beyond (1971) by Werner Heisenberg

• I feel very much like Dirac: the idea of a personal God is foreign to me. But we ought to remember that religion uses language in quite a different fashion from science. The linguistic communication of religion is more closely related to the language of poesy than to the linguistic communication of science. True, we are inclined to retrieve that science deals with information about objective facts, and poetry with subjective feelings. Hence we conclude that if faith does indeed deal with objective truths, it ought to adopt the same criteria of truth every bit science. Simply I myself find the segmentation of the world into an objective and a subjective side much too arbitrary. The fact that religions through the ages have spoken in images, parables, and paradoxes means simply that there are no other ways of grasping the reality to which they refer. Merely that does non hateful that information technology is not a 18-carat reality. And splitting this reality into an objective and a subjective side won't get usa very far.

• I consider those developments in physics during the last decades which accept shown how problematical such concepts every bit "objective" and "subjective" are, a great liberation of thought. The whole thing started with the theory of relativity. In the past, the statement that two events are simultaneous was considered an objective exclamation, one that could exist communicated quite but and that was open to verification past any observer. Today nosotros know that 'simultaneity' contains a subjective element, inasmuch as two events that appear simultaneous to an observer at residue are not necessarily simultaneous to an observer in motion. However, the relativistic description is likewise objective inasmuch as every observer tin deduce by adding what the other observer will perceive or has perceived. For all that, we have come a long mode from the classical ideal of objective descriptions.
  In quantum mechanics the deviation from this ideal has been even more radical. We can still utilise the objectifying language of classical physics to brand statements well-nigh observable facts. For instance, we can say that a photographic plate has been blackened, or that cloud droplets have formed. But nosotros tin say nothing nigh the atoms themselves. And what predictions we base on such findings depend on the way nosotros pose our experimental question, and hither the observer has liberty of option. Naturally, information technology still makes no difference whether the observer is a man, an fauna, or a piece of apparatus, but it is no longer possible to brand predictions without reference to the observer or the ways of observation. To that extent, every physical process may be said to have objective and subjective features. The objective earth of nineteenth-century scientific discipline was, as we know today, an ideal, limiting example, simply not the whole reality. Admittedly, even in our future encounters with reality we shall have to distinguish between the objective and the subjective side, to brand a segmentation between the two. But the location of the separation may depend on the way things are looked at; to a certain extent it tin be chosen at will. Hence I can quite empathise why we cannot speak about the content of religion in an objectifying language. The fact that dissimilar religions try to limited this content in quite singled-out spiritual forms is no real objection. Perhaps nosotros ought to await upon these different forms as complementary descriptions which, though they exclude one another, are needed to convey the rich possibilities flowing from human'due south relationship with the central order.

• In mathematics nosotros can take our inner distance from the content of our statements. In the final assay mathematics is a mental game that we can play or not play as we choose. Religion, on the other hand, deals with ourselves, with our life and death; its promises are meant to govern our actions and thus, at least indirectly, our very being. We cannot merely expect at them impassively from the outside. Moreover, our attitude to religious questions cannot exist separated from our attitude to guild. Even if religion arose as the spiritual construction of a item man gild, information technology is arguable whether it has remained the strongest social molding force through history, or whether society, once formed, develops new spiritual structures and adapts them to its particular level of noesis. Nowadays, the individual seems to be able to choose the spiritual framework of his thoughts and deportment quite freely, and this freedom reflects the fact that the boundaries betwixt the diverse cultures and societies are showtime to become more than fluid. But fifty-fifty when an individual tries to reach the greatest possible degree of independence, he will withal be swayed past the existing spiritual structures — consciously or unconsciously. For he, besides, must be able to speak of life and expiry and the human status to other members of the gild in which he's chosen to live; he must brainwash his children according to the norms of that club, fit into its life. Epistemological sophistries cannot possibly assistance him attain these ends. Here, too, the relationship between disquisitional idea about the spiritual content of a given religion and action based on the deliberate acceptance of that content is complementary. And such acceptance, if consciously arrived at, fills the individual with strength of purpose, helps him to overcome doubts and, if he has to suffer, provides him with the kind of solace that simply a sense of existence sheltered under an across-the-board roof can grant. In that sense, religion helps to make social life more harmonious; its nearly important task is to remind us, in the language of pictures and parables, of the wider framework within which our life is set.

Disputed [edit]

Stop telling God what to do with his dice.

• Anyone who is not shocked past quantum theory has non understood it.
  • Heisenberg recounts a personal conversation he had with Pauli and Bohr in 1952 in which Bohr says, "Those who are not shocked when they beginning come beyond quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it." Heisenberg, Werner, Physics and Beyond. (New York: Harper & Row, 1971) p. 206.
  • Bohr said this sentence in a conversation with Werner Heisenberg, as quoted in: "Der Teil und das Ganze. Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik" . R. Piper & Co., München, 1969, S. 280. DIE ZEIT 22. Aug. 1969 [1].
  • As quoted in Meeting the Universe Halfway (2007) by Karen Michelle Barad, p. 254, with the quote attributed to The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, but with no folio number or volume number given.

  • David Mermin, on pages 186–187 of his volume Boojums All the Style Through: Communicating Science in a Prosaic Age (1990) noted that he specifically looked for pithy quotes near quantum mechanics along these lines when reviewing the 3 volumes of The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, but couldn't find whatever:

    One time I tried to teach some breakthrough mechanics to a class of constabulary students, philosophers, and art historians. Equally an advertisement for the course I put together the virtually sensational quotations I could collect from the most authoritative practitioners of the subject area. Heisenberg was a goldmine: "The concept of the objective reality of the elementary particles has thus evaporated..."; "the idea of an objective real globe whose smallest parts exist considerately in the same sense as stones or trees exist, independently of whether or not we observe them ... is incommunicable ..." Feynman did his part likewise: "I think I tin can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics." Only I failed to turn up anything comparable in the writings of Bohr. Others attributed spectacular remarks to him, but he seemed to take pains to avert any hint of the dramatic in his own writings. You lot don't pack them into your classroom with "The indivisibility of quantum phenomena finds its consequent expression in the circumstance that every definable subdivision would crave a change of the experimental organisation with the appearance of new individual phenomena," or "the wider frame of complementarity straight expresses our position as regards the account of fundamental properties of matter presupposed in classical physical description but outside its scope."

    I was therefore on the lookout for nuggets when I sat downwards to review these 3 volumes – a reissue of Bohr's collected essays on the revolutionary epistemological character of the quantum theory and on the implications of that revolution for other scientific and non-scientific areas of effort (the originals first appeared in 1934, 1958, and 1963.) But the nigh radical statement I could find in all three books was this: "...physics is to be regarded non so much as the study of something a priori given, but rather as the development of methods for ordering and surveying human experience." No nuggets for the nonscientist.

  • Variants: Those who are not shocked when they first come up across quantum mechanics cannot possibly take understood it.
    Those who are non shocked when they first come up across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it.
    Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has non understood a single give-and-take.
    If you recall you tin can talk about quantum theory without feeling lightheaded, you haven't understood the first thing about it.

• Prediction is very difficult, especially almost the future.
  • As quoted in Instruction and Learning Unproblematic Social Studies (1970) by Arthur K. Ellis, p. 431
  • The above quote is as well attributed to various humourists and the Danish poet Piet Hein: "det er svært at spå – især om fremtiden"
  • It is also attributed to Danish cartoonist Storm P (Robert Tempest Petersen).
  • Variant: It's hard to make predictions, particularly about the future.

• Stop telling God what to practise with his dice.
  • A response to Einstein'southward assertion that "God doesn't play dice"; a like statement is attributed to Enrico Fermi
  • Variant: Einstein, don't tell God what to do.
  • Variant: Don't tell God what to do with his dice.
  • Variant: You ought not to speak for what Providence can or can not practice. – As described in The Physicists: A generation that changed the world (1981) by C. P. Snow, p. 84

• Of course not ... simply I am told information technology works even if you don't believe in it.
  • Respond to a company to his dwelling in Tisvilde who asked him if he actually believed a horseshoe above his door brought him luck, as quoted in Inward Leap : Of Matter and Forces in the Physical Globe (1986) past Abraham Pais, p. 210
  • In nearly published accounts of this anecdote such was Bohr'south answer to his friend, only in one early business relationship, in The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy (1974) by Samuel Sambursky, p. 357, Bohr was at a friend's business firm and asked "Do yous really believe in this?" to which his friend replied "Oh, I don't believe in it. But I am told it works even if you lot don't believe in it."
  • Variant: No, but I'1000 told information technology works even if you don't believe in it.

Quotes almost Bohr [edit]

Alphabetized by author

• Bohr seemed to think that he had solved this question. I could non discover his solution in his writings. Simply there was no doubt that he was convinced that he had solved the problem and, in so doing, had not merely contributed to atomic physics, simply to epistemology, to philosophy, to humanity in general. And there are astonishing passages in his writings in which he is sort of patronizing to the ancient Far Eastern philosophers, almost proverb that he had solved the problems that had defeated them. It's an extraordinary thing for me—the character of Bohr—absolutely puzzling. I like to speak of two Bohrs: one is a very pragmatic fellow who insists that the apparatus is classical, and the other is a very arrogant, pontificating man who makes enormous claims for what he has done.
  • John South. Bell, quoted in Jeremy Bernstein, Quantum Profiles (1991), John Stewart Bong: Quantum Engineer

• I of the favorite maxims of my father was the distinction between the ii sorts of truths, profound truths recognized by the fact that the reverse is as well a profound truth, in contrast to trivialities where opposites are obviously absurd.
  • Hans Henrik Bohr, writing about his father in "My father" in Niels Bohr - His Life and Work As Seen By His Friends and Colleagues (1967), South. Rozental, ed.

• If breakthrough theory has whatsoever philosophical importance at all, it lies in the fact that it demonstrates for a single, sharply defined science the necessity of dual aspects and complementary considerations. Niels Bohr has discussed this question with respect to many applications in physiology, psychology, and philosophy in full general.
  • Max Born in Natural Philosophy of Crusade and Hazard (1949) ch. 10, p. 127

• Non often in life has a homo being caused me such joy by his mere presence as y'all did.
  • Albert Einstein in a letter to Bohr (1920)

• It is practically impossible to describe Niels Bohr to a person who has never worked with him. Probably his well-nigh feature property was the slowness of his thinking and comprehension. When, in the tardily twenties and early on thirties, the author of this book was one of the "Bohr boys" working in his Institute in Copenhagen on a Carlsberg (the best beer in the globe!) fellowship, he had many a chance to observe it. In the evening, when a scattering of Bohr's students were "working" in the Paa Blegdamsvejen Constitute, discussing the latest issues of the breakthrough theory, or playing Ping-pong on the library table with coffee cups placed on it to make the game more difficult, Bohr would appear, complaining that he was very tired, and would similar to "do something." To "do something" inevitably meant to become to the movies, and the only movies Bohr liked were those called The Gun Fight at the Lazy Gee Ranch or The Lonely Ranger and a Sioux Girl. But it was hard to get with Bohr to the movies. He could not follow the plot, and was constantly asking us, to the corking annoyance of the rest of the audience, questions like this: "Is that the sister of that cowboy who shot the Indian who tried to steal a herd of cattle belonging to her blood brother-in-law?" The aforementioned slowness of reaction was apparent at scientific meetings. Many a fourth dimension, a visiting young physicist (almost physicists visiting Copenhagen were young) would deliver a brilliant talk about his recent calculations on some intricate problem of the quantum theory. Everybody in the audition would understand the statement quite clearly, but Bohr wouldn't. So everybody would commencement to explain to Bohr the simple bespeak he had missed, and in the resulting turmoil everybody would stop understanding anything. Finally, after a considerable period of fourth dimension, Bohr would begin to understand, and it would turn out that what he understood about the problem presented past the visitor was quite different from what the visitor meant, and was correct, while the visitor'southward interpretation was wrong.
  • George Gamow on Niels Bohr in "The Great Physicists from Galileo to Einstein" (1961) pg. 237

• I call up discussions with Bohr which went through many hours till very late at night and ended nigh in despair; and when at the end of the discussion I went lone for a walk in the neighbouring park I repeated to myself again and again the question: Can nature possibly be so cool as it seemed to us in these atomic experiments?
  • Werner Heisenberg in Physics and Philosophy (1958)

• The showtime affair Bohr said to me was that it would only then be assisting to work with him if I understood that he was a dilettante. The just way I knew to react to this unexpected statement was with a polite smile of disbelief. But evidently Bohr was serious. He explained how he had to approach every new question from a starting point of total ignorance. It is mayhap better to say that Bohr's strength lay in his formidable intuition and insight rather than erudition.
  • Abraham Pais, in testimony in Niels Bohr : His Life and Piece of work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues (1967) edited by Stefan Rozental, p. 218; later in his own piece of work, Niels Bohr'southward Times : In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity (1991)

• When asked whether the algorism of breakthrough mechanics could be considered equally somehow mirroring an underlying quantum earth, Bohr would reply, "There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract quantum physical description. It is wrong to think that the job of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what nosotros can say about nature." Bohr felt that every step in the development of physics has strengthened the view that the problem of establishing an unambiguous description of nature has simply one solution. He regarded all attempts to supersede our uncomplicated concepts or to introduce a new logic to business relationship for the peculiarities of quantum phenomena as non merely unnecessary but also incompatible with our nearly fundamental conditions, since we are suspended in a unique linguistic communication.
  • Aage Petersen, "The philosophy of Niels Bohr" by in the Message of the Atomic Scientists Vol. 19, No. 7 (September 1963); The Genius of Science: A Portrait Gallery (2000) by Abraham Pais, p. 24, and Niels Bohr: Reflections on Subject and Object (2001) by Paul. McEvoy, p. 291
  • Quotes about quote:
    • To my great pleasance, Victor Weisskopf was sitting in his usual identify in the forepart row, smiling approvingly up at me. (It's surprising how much such encouragement from such a source can better the quality of a talk.) His smiles continued correct up to the moment when I read the Petersen quotation. No sooner had I finished reading it than Viki was on his feet. "That's outrageous," he proclaimed. "Bohr couldn't possibly take said anything like that!" Somewhat taken ashamed by this sudden flip from beatitude to condemnation, I feebly protested that I wasn't attributing information technology to Bohr, just to Aage Petersen's memory of Bohr. That did non extinguish the flames. "Shame on Aage Petersen," alleged Viki, "for putting those ridiculous words into Bohr'south rima oris!"
      • N. David Mermin, "What'due south Wrong With This Breakthrough World?" Physics Today Vol. 52, No. 2 (Feb 2004), p. x.

• [Bohr was] a marvelous physicist, one of the greatest of all time, only he was a miserable philosopher, and one couldn't talk to him. He was talking all the time, allowing practically simply one or two words to you and then at once cutting in.
  • Karl Popper, quoted in John Horgan, The Terminate of Scientific discipline (1996), Ch. two : The Finish of Philosophy

• "Y'all can talk well-nigh people like Buddha, Jesus, Moses, Confucius, but the thing that convinced me that such people existed were the conversations with Bohr," Dr. Wheeler said.
  • John A. Wheeler as quoted by Dennis Overbye in "John A. Wheeler, Physicist Who Coined the Term 'Black Hole,' Is Expressionless at 96". NY Times. (14 April 2008)

• Niels Bohr distinguished two kinds of truths. An ordinary truth is a statement whose opposite is a falsehood. A profound truth is a statement whose opposite is also a profound truth.
  • Frank Wilczek, The Lightness of Being (2008)

External links [edit]

• Niels Bohr Archive
• Nobel Foundation: Niels Bohr
• Near Niels Bohr
• Niels Bohr Quotes Video

franklandsivent.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr

Share this post